| Master Tips are provided by Steve Fleishman, author of "Spades for Winners" and "Master Spades." You too can have your Spades questions answered here. Submit your questions by clicking on the label below. |
| Question: I learned a bidding system where you increase your bid 2 1/2 tricks for a void and 1 1/2 for a singleton. Does this sound reasonable? |
| - dirtydog3 |
| Forget this silly system. Short suits don't win any tricks at all; spades do. If you have a void or singleton, add 1 to your bid if you have exactly three small spades, or Axx or Kxx. Do not increase your bid at all if you have four or more spades; you have already accounted for your spade length. Never add more than 1 for shortness. |
| Question: One of our regular players is always leading spades, often as early as she can. No one can get through to her that this isn't a good idea. Why do people do this? |
| - mary_p |
| I hate to tell you this, but she may be the only player in your crowd who really knows how to play Spades. A trump lead at the right time is one of the most powerful plays available. The trick, of course, is to know the right time. For example, always play two early rounds of spades whenever your side has bid a total of 9 or more. In general, lead spades whenever you think your side has the majority of spades. |
| Question: Is it a good idea to always lead out your singleton? |
| - scorpius23 |
| No, not always.
Often you have a better lead, for example starting a suit headed by the
KQJ. You want to drive out the ace to set up your other honor
cards.
Do not go looking to cut when you have good spades; you'll not win extra tricks that way. Save the singleton lead for when you have poor spades. |
| Question: I was dealt the Q J 10 of clubs. Should I add 1 to my bid for this club suit, or do I treat it as worthless? |
| - anonymous |
|
If you have spade length and you are on lead, you have fine chances to make an extra club trick for your side. That doesn't mean you should increase your bid, however. In Spades it does not pay to strain to bid one more. There is only a small reward for being right but a heavy penalty for being wrong. |
| Question: My partner and I took nearly all the tricks on this deal [hands enclosed] where I trumped clubs and he trumped hearts. The opponents laughed at us for being grossly underbid. How could we have bid this any better? |
| - Daisy_girl |
| Forget about it. It is absolutely impossible to diagnose a crossruff, or crossfire, in the bidding stage. You bid correctly; the arrangement of the cards simply was highly favorable for your side. |
| Question: Got any good tips for avoiding bags? |
| - anonymous |
| Sure. Bid more
aggressively.
In terms of card play, some of the tactics available such as withholding aces, overtaking Partner's winner, or leading middle cards, may be effective on some hands but fail on others. The difference is that bags ultimately go to the players who have no small cards. Don't begin play by allowing the opponents to win a few easy tricks. Aggressive play at the start of the hand causes the opponents to worry about making their bid; then they usually wind up with the overtricks themselves. In practice, weak players worry far more about bags than do strong players. The experts are always looking for the set, and don't mind taking an extra bag or two if there is any possibility at all of setting the opponents. |
| Question: If you have cards like AK764 is it better to lead the ace or the king? |
| - mary_p |
| If you have an
average partner, it really doesn't matter. If you have a strong partner,
watch what Pard does and do the same thing.
But the best players always choose the king. When the king holds and they switch, their partners know where the ace is hiding, and they can develop their strategy from that information. Good players know how to 'read' a hand, but they can only do so if partner plays, logical consistent leads. |
|
Question: Got any tips how to play when your partner bets nil? |
| - Dan Witten |
Good question, Dan.
I could write a chapter on this. Maybe I will.
|
| Question: I start with AK952 of hearts and I lead the ace and king. Everyone plays low cards. Is it good or bad to lead a third heart now? |
| - Josh Kominski |
This question
misses the point of playing good Spades, which is that on every hand you
must have a game plan or a strategy. Consider these two hands:
In the second example, your plan is simply to scramble for whatever tricks you can. The results of a third round of hearts are unpredictable, but they usually favor the opponents who are presented with too many options. Better to switch to clubs at Trick Three. |
| Question: I have always played that you can call a misdeal if you have no spades, and that everyone must play their lowest club to the first trick. Isn't this part of the rules? |
| - Jan McPherson |
| There is no 'official' set of rules for Spades, so there are many variations. I will place your question in the Message Forum and perhaps others will let us know what they think of the various options and variations. |
| Question: I have played through your deals in the next section and want you to know that we don't play at all like that. We take our aces, then kings and don't lead spades until the end when that's all that's left. Are we playing the same game? |
| - Art Kuffner |
| In every game or
sport, the style of play is different at each level. At the beginners' or
elementary level of Spades, the players just scramble for tricks,
concerned only with making their own individual bids.
Intermediate players have learned to count cards and there is an attempt at teamwork and also an (over)emphasis on bags. At the advanced level of Spades, the bidding and the play is more aggressive. The players have the ability to read a hand. Bags are all but ignored as each team actively seeks to set the other side. I invite you to go over the Master Deals again to see if you can follow the logic and the reasoning behind each recommended line of play. Spades can be played purely for fun, or it can be very competitive. |
| Question: Is it worth it to win a lot of bags to set a
low-level bid? Suppose they bid 3 and you bid 7. It takes four bags to set
them. |
| - ViJay |
| Always play for the
set. In the situation you described, have you considered it probably takes
only one bag to register the set? That is, if you do not try for
the set you will likely take all three available bags anyway. Three bags
and no set is a pretty sorry result. With a little extra effort you might
be able to take one more trick. Now the set costs but a single bag -
well worth it.
By the way, setting a 3-bid is a 60-point swing; They have lost -30 points instead of going +30. On this deal you have gained 100 points (with the set) instead of netting only 40 points for letting them make. In summary, always play for the set. |
| Question: It seems to me that on most of the [Master Deals], most players seem to "bid their hand" (which to some of us is considered overbidding). Especially if you are the first or second bidder... it is good to underbid by 1/2 to 1 bid for the following reasons: [see below] |
| - Executive_Eagle |
| You have given good reasons for a bidding philosophy different from my own aggressive style. I have moved the full text of your post to the Message Forum where others may read your ideas and add their comments. |
| Question: Are any of your books available on line? i.e. Barnes & Noble.com? |
| - Executive_Eagle |
|
The book "Spades for Winners" can be ordered from this website or from amazon.com |
Question: I was told to bid 4 with AKQ2
and that AKQ53 is also a 4 bid. Help! |
| - mary_p |
That's right, both
holdings should be counted as 4. Bidding in Spades is not an exact
science. Statistically, the first holding may be worth only 3.75 tricks,
while the stronger five-card holding may be worth 4.25 tricks. But you
have to round to a whole number. Bidding less than 4 with AKQ2 is for the faint-hearted -- those who dread being set
and don't mind collecting bags. |
Question: Should you count the Qx for a
trick when you bid? |
| - Marla |
| The simple answer
is "No." The reason is not that you are afraid someone will plunk down the
ace and king of trump (which could happen, of course), but that any
doubleton spade holding calls for conservative bidding.
We can look deeper into this question by examining two game situations:
I recommend a bid of 3 for the second hand. The opponents will not have many spades and no one will have any reason to lead out the ace and king early on. You have too many chances for a third trick to go chicken with a 2-bid. Note you are not just bidding one more for the queen; you up your bid because you like the hand 'texture.' |
| Question: While playing spades recently, our opponents decided that we had reneged on our play. Well they were wrong and decided to challenge and insited on seeing the cards that were previously played. Should they get points removed from their score for this? |
| - Jstessman4 |
| Any player may ask
to see the last trick before it is his turn to play to the next
trick. If the issue is a matter of a renege, or revoke, it is settled
right away.
If a player believes a renege occurred earlier in the deal, play must continue until the end of the deal, at which point the cards are examined. If a renege has indeed occurred, the offending side loses their bid and the other pair is given a make. (No bags are scored.) There is no penalty for a mistaken claim of a renege. |
|
(There is more information on the renege and other infractions on Page 2 of Master Tips.) |
| Question: If you and your partner have made your bid early, how can you tell if you should try for the set or just avoid taking bags? |
| - Jerry |
You should be
keeping track of the 'count' cards (aces and kings, which a player counts
for his bid) and unexpected tricks (those won by lower cards, or by
overtrumping from a short spade holding). Play for the set if:
In general, watch partner's card play when he is not winning tricks. If he is playing low-high, he is still battling. If he follows high-low, he has abandoned the attack. Remember to help partner by playing the same way. |
| Question: When do you know to run spades, immediately when they're broke, or after you have cleaned out all other suits, and you're sure you or your partner hold boss? |
| - Anonymous University of Colorado Student |
A key step in the
development of Spades players, after acquiring the habit of counting the
cards as they are played, is to acquire the judgement of knowing when it
is right to lead spades. Players must first accept these two fundamental
properties regarding the spade suit:
There are also times to lead spades strictly for defensive purposes; every good player knows that the only way to stop an enemy crossruff is to lead trump, regardless of your holding. The mark of the strong Spades player is the timely spade lead. You will not always get it right; but an occasional misfire should not discourage you from trying to develop the necessary judgement. |
| Question: What bidding system do you recommend? |
| - Christina |
There are several
complicated systems in use, but I prefer to keep it simple. Assuming
normal spade length (three cards or more),
These are your primary factors, and most players can stop right here. Then come secondary considerations such as hand texture and favorable or unfavorable distribution. Finally, there are adjustments based on the game situation, which includes the score, bags, the other bids, and the abilities of the other players. Other systems suggest using fractions to arrive at your final bid, or formulas to take suit length into consideration. These systems may even be better - who knows? I still prefer simplicity. For reference, here are some links to other bidding systems.
Jeff's Spade Page
|