|
In a previous Spades Strategy article, Away From the Ace, I showed that it is frequently a much better play to underlead the Ace of spades rather than to start with the Ace itself. Since that article appeared I have tried the tactic several times. When paired with a random partner, even one who is supposed to be experienced, I did not always achieve optimum results. Let us examine one of the casualties and then I will introduce a small refinement that might help. The following 5-card position is the ending of a 12-bid. Both
North/South and East/West need two more tricks to make their respective
bids. North and South have no problems at all. Even better -- if they can
win four of the remaining five, they have a set. Someone leads a diamond and
South trumps with the
With all cards in view we can see there is only one way to guarantee the
set. South must lead a low spade, away from the Ace, to North's So what's the problem? The typical North, confronted with South's lead
of the North's error is not uncommon, even from players who classify themselves as 'strong.' This website even showcased a deal in the feature You Be the Judge ( #8a, post mortem)that was based on this very same misjudgment. South must help his partner as much as possible. Using Standard Leads,
the lead of a low card suggests strength in that suit. South must
trump the diamond with his The underlead of the Ace of Spades is generally a no-lose play that often brings huge gains. It is always so depressing when the advantage of such cleverness is lost due to one's partner using cleverness of his own. Trumping with a middle spade in order to lead a small one might be all the encouragement he needs. Regards, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||