|
You Be the Judge #15 Posted July 28, 2002
The Public Responds:Brandon: YBTJ 15 was much harder than the other YBTJ's! Maybe that's why we had only two panelists this week. Spades players don't like to embarrass themselves. Now, tell us what you think of the East/West bidding. Brandon: Summary: Given the situation, the bidding is ok, even though West is short in Spades. Purple Cow: West bid: Aggressive, but not unreasonable. The singleton spade is a caution flag, but given the state of the match and the huge excess of secondary honors, this call is valid. East bid: When East bids 6 bringing the total to 13, some second-guessing may be in order. After all, who at the table is most likely to be stretching? West of course. Yet the strong spade suit seems to suggest that the 6-call is reasonable again. Hopefully East gave this some thought before making his bid at least. That eliminates all the nasty accusations and finger pointing. Well maybe doesn't eliminate it, but makes it easier to bear. Unfortunately, both partner's stretching their bid usually spells trouble. We also warmly endorse the bidding, since all decisions conform to our own quaint notions. West has short spades but great hand texture; and the second bidder should be aggressive. East is entitled to raise the total to 13 because of his strong spades. As for the play, making the E/W bid is as easy as the right guess at Trick 5. Brandon:
Round 5 -- CRITICAL PLAY! North is out of hearts. East
has the Ace. West doesn't want North to cut and gain
an unexpected trick. Switch suits! Diamonds or
Clubs? Pard probably has lots of spades (he bid 6 and
has the The club switch turns out to be the winner. It is likely that West feared he was placing East in a trump/overtrump situation, but another few seconds of thought would show that the risk must be taken. The best hope lies in having East break spades, and a diamond lead simply cannot get the job done. Can East/West still recover? Brandon:
Round 7 -- GAME LOSING PLAY! East has
two choices, duck or trump.
If East cuts with a card other than East must duck! If he ducks by discarding the Purple Cow:
Could they have brought this bid home? Yes! Though it would require a quite
quixotic play. To properly locate it, it's necessary to note some things
from the early play of the hand. Tricks 3&4, North completes a hi-lo echo in
hearts, indicating desire for a 3rd round cut. East should file this
information away, it may be useful later. On Trick 6, the What a headache. East can cut, and figures South is waiting to overcut. In such cases, anything can be right, trump low, trump intermediate, or discard. Declarers in bridge often ask themselves, "What can go wrong?" That's the view to take on this. What can go wrong is, if South can win this trick, as sure as I'm a purple
cow, he will lead a heart for North to cut. North's ruff will be the setting
trick. East can afford to lose two spade tricks but not three. South, who has
shown only the The winning play is to discard the Wow! Throw away an Ace? But our panelists' reasining is perfectly sound. It leaves us gasping. This case is dismissed so we can catch our breath. We still have one more case to hear.
The Public Responds:The next case brought in a split decision. The panelists agreed that South did not play at his best, but they disagreed upon what should have been done. First we'll hear the case for deceptive play. Brandon: E/W played very well. But South could have played better. The one thing South needed to do was keep the defenders guessing as to who had the Aces of Hearts and Diamonds. Get them to lead the wrong suits. Plus by retaining the Aces, South can sever communication between the defenders. It was a mistake for South to play both Heart and Diamond Aces. Play the 10's or duck. Let the defenders think North may
have the We like the concept of making the opponents guess, but is it really the proper strategy here? The unimaginative play of leading the top hearts ought to get the job done. Show us how you want to play the South hand. Brandon:
Round 2 - North wouldn't bid a risky nil, with a
singleton Heart JQK, play the 4 and duck. Pard wouldn't
bid a risky nil with a Alas, the Our second panelist tries a different approach. Purple Cow: North's nil bid is sound, and E/W defended well. Souths have covered better in the past though too. The 4-4-4-1 club distribution set the nil. When the nilling side meets that unhappy distribution, the key is for one of them to get a discard in the danger suit. Of course, no one can know what the distribution is. Still with proper coverage from South, and best defense from E/W, this nil... still fails. The key to me is, at Trick 3, the diamond shift was poorly reasoned. South should persist in either clubs or hearts. Leading the diamonds makes life easy for the defense. If South had a long, strong spade suit, the diamond lead may be right, but there's nothing to indicate that this lead will be helpful in this case. Either a club or heart continuation is also fruitless though against best
defense. But it does make them work a little harder. East will have to trump
in at the proper time, and attack in diamonds (or spades) to establish an
entry to Pard's hand for club leads. Either way, with the The lead of the And it is as simple as that. After winning the East/West do have a trick defense, however. It may not be clear to everyone what the best East/West defense is, especially since West has already thrown a heart honor at Trick 2. He's not allowed to take it back. But further discussion of this deal can become a topic for the Forum. We hope you have enjoyed playing "You Be the Judge." Visit Master Spades often for new features. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
